ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES SUITABILITY FOR LOCAL OPERATION BASED ON THE INTEGRAL INDICATOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32718/agroengineering2025.29.79-86Keywords:
electric vehicle, urban operation, selection criteria, integral indicator, multi-criteria analysis method, energy efficiency, specific energy consumptionAbstract
This article addresses the important scientific and practical issue of selecting the optimal electric vehicle (EV) model for use in the specific conditions of urban agglomerations in Ukraine. The current trends in the transport market show a rapid increase in interest in "clean" technologies. However, this growth is hindered by inadequate charging infrastructure, unstable power supply, and the limited financial means of most consumers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a scientifically grounded approach for comprehensively assessing vehicle suitability, particularly for local short-distance trips. During the research, a thorough analysis of contemporary scientific literature and statistical data regarding the dynamics of the EV market was conducted. This analysis allowed for the identification of key criteria that shape consumer priorities. Unlike existing approaches that often emphasize maximum technical specifications, this paper proposes an enhanced system of evaluation criteria. In addition to standard technical indicators (such as range, charging power, and reliability) and economic indicators (such as purchase cost and maintenance costs), the parameter of "energy efficiency" (specific energy consumption measured in kWh/100 km) is incorporated. This inclusion enables more accurate forecasting of operational costs. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the development of a comprehensive multi-criteria assessment methodology. This methodology uses weighting coefficients to reflect the significance of each criterion, tailored to the realities of urban operation in Ukraine, and applies the linear scaling method (min-max) for normalizing diverse parameters. This approach allows for the consolidation of cost, technical, and ergonomic indicators into a single dimensionless evaluation scale. The distribution of weight coefficients was carefully justified, with financial affordability assigned the highest priority (0.25), while energy efficiency and operational costs each received significant weights (0.15). The range for urban cycle was considered a secondary factor (0.15). The methodology was tested using six of the most popular models available on the Ukrainian market: Nissan Leaf, Renault Zoe, Hyundai Kona Electric, Volkswagen e-Golf, Tesla Model 3, and Tesla Model Y. The calculation of the integral suitability indicator revealed that for short-distance use, compact models performed better. Renault Zoe (integral indicator of 7.95) and Hyundai Kona Electric (7.90) ranked the highest, providing an optimal balance of initial investments, operational costs, and functionality. In contrast, more technologically advanced Tesla models received lower ratings (ranging from 7.70 to 7.80) primarily due to their high costs, which are a critical concern for the average consumer. Additionally, sensitivity analysis indicated that in a scenario of rising electricity tariffs, the competitive advantage shifts toward models with the highest energy efficiency, such as the Hyundai Kona Electric. The practical significance of these results lies in the creation of a universal toolkit designed to optimize the selection of vehicles for both individual users and corporate fleets, aiming to minimize the total cost of ownership.
References
Al-Ghamdi, A. M. (2024). Electric vehicle adoption: A comprehensive systematic review of technological, environmental, organizational and policy impacts. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15 (8), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080375
Dziura, V. O. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia systemy tekhnichnoho servisu elektromobiliv v Ukraini. Visnyk mashynobuduvannia ta transportu, 2 (14), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.31649/2413-4503-2021-14-2-34-40
Ecer, F. (2023). An extended MCDM framework for the assessment of battery electric vehicles in the era of smart mobility. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 126, 106883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106883
Gaton, A. (2023). Electric vehicles: The future of transport and the challenge of infrastructure. Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 12 (3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2023.04.012
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Institute of Car Market Research. (2024). Rynok elektromobiliv v Ukraini: analityka ta trendy 2023 roku. Retrieved from: https://eauto.org.ua/statistics/2023 (Accessed February 05, 2025).
International Energy Agency. (2024). Global EV outlook 2024: Moving towards a stronger EV market. Retrieved from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024 (Accessed February 05, 2025).
Klymenko, O. M. (2021). Ekolohichna bezpeka avtotransportnykh potokiv ta perspektyvy elektromobilizatsii mist Ukrainy. Ekolohichna bezpeka ta pryrodokorystuvannia, 3 (39), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2021.3.45-52
Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
Mateichyk, V. P., Smikhula, A. V., & Sadkovyi, V. P. (2018). Vyznachennia enerhetychnoi efektyvnosti elektromobilia v umovakh miskoho tsyklu rukhu. Avtomobilnyi transport, (42), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.30977/AT.2219-8342.2018.42.0.27
Opendatabot. (2024). Rekordnyi import elektrokariv: yak zminyvsia rynok u 2024 rotsi. Retrieved from: https://opendatabot.ua/analytics/ev-import-2024 (Accessed February 05, 2025).
Polyvianchuk, A. P. (2020). Otsinka ekolohichnoi efektyvnosti ekspluatatsii elektromobiliv v umovakh miskoho rukhu. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho avtomobilno-dorozhnoiho universytetu, (89), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.30977/BUL.2219-5548.2020.89.0.62
Ruban, D., Krainyk, L., Ruban, H., Khimka, S., & Sukach, O. (2025). Identifying the influence of micro profile of rural roads on the durability of bus body when carrying passengers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (7(133)), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325773
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1 (1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sakhno, V. P., & Poliakov, V. M. (2019). Doslidzhennia ekspluatatsiinykh vlastyvostei elektromobiliv v umovakh nyzkykh temperatur. Visnyk Natsionalnoho transportnoho universytetu, (44), 258–265. Retrieved from: http://publications.ntu.edu.ua/visnyk/44/258-265.pdf (Accessed February 05, 2025).
Sukach, O., Habriiel, Ya., Shevchuk, V., & Khimka, S. (2023). Obgruntuvannia sposobu keruvannia manipuliatornymy ustanovkamy vantazhnykh avtomobiliv. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu pryrodokorystuvannia. Seriia: Ahroinzhenerni doslidzhennia, (27), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.31734/agroengineering2023.27.035
Ukravtoprom. (2025). Statystyka reiestratsii elektromobiliv v Ukraini (BEV). Retrieved from: https://ukravtoprom.com.ua /(Accessed February 05, 2025).
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro deiaki pytannia vvezennia na mytnu terytoriiu Ukrainy ta provedennia pershoi derzhavnoi reiestratsii transportnykh zasobiv”. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2754-19 (Accessed February 05, 2025).
Vincentric LLC. (2024, April). Vincentric 2024 US electric vehicle cost of ownership analysis. Retrieved from: https://vincentric.com/Home/Industry-Reports (Accessed February 05, 2025).
Yeshchenko, O. O. (2022). Problemy ta perspektyvy utylizatsii litii-ionnykh akumuliatoriv elektromobiliv v Ukraini. Enerhetyka: ekonomika, tekhnolohii, ekolohiia, (3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.3.2022.263841.
